Daypilot production plan - #56
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30439923 | Triggered | Generic Password | 4dee6e4 | tests/test_forge_auth.py | View secret |
| 30439923 | Triggered | Generic Password | 4dee6e4 | tests/test_mcp_gateway_config.py | View secret |
| 30439923 | Triggered | Generic Password | 4dee6e4 | tests/test_mcp_gateway_config.py | View secret |
| 30439923 | Triggered | Generic Password | 4dee6e4 | tests/test_forge_auth.py | View secret |
| 30439923 | Triggered | Generic Password | 4dee6e4 | tests/test_forge_auth.py | View secret |
| 30439923 | Triggered | Generic Password | 4dee6e4 | tests/test_mcp_gateway_config.py | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secrets safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate these secrets.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stop reporting a sandbox run as an empty plan
"run hello_world.py" is answered by the deterministic short-circuit in
agentic.py: no LLM involved, one step whose file action is EXECUTE, and an
execution_planbuilt in pure Python for the green approval card.The chat UI then classified that response as empty and printed "The
model returned an empty plan. Try rephrasing more concretely, or pick a
stronger model in Settings → Provider" — advice that could not possibly
help, because no model produced the plan. Its actionable-action list was
CREATE / MODIFY / DELETE, and EXECUTE was never added to it. Every
sandbox run from chat hit this, whatever the backend or the model.
execution_planis nowactionable on its own — it is built from a resolved path in Python, so
it cannot be a hallucination and is a stronger signal than
steps.the user sees a working plan or a failure banner, which is too much to
leave inline in a component that needs a browser to run.
declines a file and the green card is absent but the step is real.
tests/test_plan_kind_classifier.py runs the shipped module under node and
feeds it the real
try_execute_short_circuitpayload, so both sides ofthe boundary are checked against each other rather than against a
hand-typed fixture. Reverting either half of the fix fails a test.